|
Turkey Imposes New Precondition on Armenia
ANKARA, Turkey-Turkey has set a new precondition
for the normalization of its relations with Armenia by demanding
that the latter give Azerbaijan an overland link with Nakhichevan
in any future peace agreement over Nagorno Karabagh, reported RFE/RL.
During a meeting in Ankara with US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld
on June 6, Turkish Prime Minister Bulent Ecevit told him that a
"security corridor" passing through southeastern Armenia
should be a key point of the peace settlement.
The Turkish government had previously announced that
it would not establish diplomatic relations with Armenia until Yerevan
ensures Karabagh's return to Azerbaijani control and abandons its
pursuit of international recognition of the Armenian Genocide.
In Baku, Turkish Ambassador to Azerbaijan Kadri Ecvet
Tezcan confirmed that his country put forward a third precondition.
"I cannot imagine Nakhichevan separated from the main part
of Azerbaijan," Tezcan said. He also claimed that "Meghri
was Azerbaijani land some time ago. This region was given to Armenia
during Soviet times and consequently Nakhichevan and Azerbaijan
were separated."
Armenian Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian called the
new demand "unacceptable" and "nonsensical."
He said that Turkey cannot make its relations with Armenia conditional
on the latter's ties with a third country.
Tezcan argued that Turkey wants to be "closely
involved" in the Karabagh issue because of its "love for
the Azerbaijani people and because of international law."
Turkey is linked to Nakhichevan by a ten-kilometer
strip of land. Such a land corridor through Meghri would provide
it with a conduit to the rest of Azerbaijan and other Turkic republics
of the former Soviet Union.
Following a wave of official recognition of
the Armenian Genocide by several European parliaments last year,
Ankara signaled its intention to soften its policy on Armenia. Foreign
Minister Oskanian said the move has proved to be a public relations
move aimed at staving off similar resolutions by other Western legislatures.
People of Meghri Oppose Corridor Idea
YEREVAN, Armenia-Various official representatives
of the southern region of Meghri in Armenia issued a formal statement
this week rejecting discussions about a corridor through the territory
linking Azerbaijan and Nakhichevan. The corridor has been discussed
in talks sponsored by the OSCE Minsk Group to resolve the Nagorno
Karabagh conflict.
The statement was signed by the mayors of Meghri and
Agarak, the heads of the villages in the Meghri region, the heads
of the territorial organizations of the Hanrabedutiun Party, the
Armenian People's Party, the Armenian Republican Party, the Armenian
Communist Party, the manager of the Meghri territorial communications,
and former parliamentarian David Matevosian.
The following is the text of the "Statement
by the People of Meghri":
Various rumors are circulating about the settlement
of the Nagorno Karabagh conflict, such as granting Azerbaijan a
corridor through Meghri.
In favor of an immediate peaceful settlement of the
conflict on the basis of mutual compromises, recalling that at the
time of extremely tense Armenian-Azeri relations (1991-92) the functioning
of the main communication (railway) through Meghri was provided
without the help of any outside force, which was also the result
of the will of the local population and the fact that the above
communication was severed by the Azeri side due to its blockade
of Armenia, we consider the inclusion of a Meghri corridor in the
package of the resolution of the Karabagh problem, the restoration
of communications and deployment of peacekeeping forces unacceptable.
On the basis of the aforementioned we state:
- The granting of a corridor via Meghri within the
package of the settlement of the Karabagh conflict or the deployment
of peacekeeping forces for the restoration of communications does
not promote the settlement of the conflict but directly threatens
Armenia's sovereignty and national security.
- Excluding the existence of a corridor and the presence
of peacekeeping forces we consider the restoration of communications
necessary and take responsibility for their unhindered functioning.
- The granting of a corridor via Meghri or the deployment
of peacekeeping forces for the restoration of communications is
fraught with danger, and the entire responsibility for this is
to be assumed by those who want to impose such a solution to the
process.
|