|
The ADL Must Decide: Will they Serve the
Truth or Will They Serve Turkey?
By Michael G. Mensoian
"The Armenian Weekly", Volume 73, No.
34, August 25, 2007
The belated backtracking of the
Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in acknowledging the planned,
systematic massacre of 1,500,000 Armenian men, women and
children as “…tantamount to genocide…” is discouraging.
Tantamount means something is equivalent. If it’s
equivalent, why avoid using the term? For the ADL to justify
its newly adopted statement because the word genocide did
not exist at the time indicates a halfhearted attempt to
placate Armenians while not offending Turkey. Historians use
the term genocide simply because it is the proper term to
describe the horrific events that the Ottoman Turkish
government unleashed on the Armenian people.
Andrew H. Tarsy, the New England regional director of the
ADL, was dismissed for publicly acknowledging the Armenian
genocide. He could no longer in good conscience support the
ADL’s position that rejected the objective evidence. Bravo
to any man that allows the truth to be his guide.
For the ADL to have maintained such a position was immoral
and indefensible. And then as a sop to assuage Armenians,
they have said that they will continue their efforts to have
Turkey “…do more to confront its past.” Does the ADL really
believe that their exhortations are seriously received by
Turkish leaders? Turkey has had nearly 100 years to confront
its past, but instead has decided to follow a policy of
denial and historic revisionism.
Prominent Turkish scholars are now beginning to confront
this dark period in modern Turkish history. Unfortunately,
within Turkey these intellectuals are viewed as pariahs.
If the ADL doesn’t have the courage to properly acknowledge
the crime that has been committed against the Armenian
nation, any intercession on behalf of the Armenian Cause is
neither desired nor worthwhile. Their position does a
disservice to the Jewish people who have a long and
well-documented history of fighting injustices. This is
precisely why there was an immediate ground swell of opinion
within the Jewish community denouncing the ADL’s untenable
position when it was exposed to the light of day.
Unfortunately for the ADL, when it had the opportunity
several days ago to revisit the issue of the Armenian
genocide, the very best their leaders could do was to say
that the planned systematic killing of over 1,500,000
Armenian men, women and children that took place between
1915 to 1918 was “tantamount to genocide.” Not exactly
genocide mind you, but equivalent to genocide. Either the
ADL recognizes the Armenian genocide or it doesn’t. There
can be no equivocation on this most important issue.
How do the leaders of the ADL believe that any meaningful
dialogue with Armenians can occur when they have studiously
avoided recognizing the Armenian genocide? Then for the ADL
to say that they will continue to oppose the resolution
being debated in Congress clearly indicates their true
position with respect to the Armenian genocide. Shame on the
leadership of the ADL.
There are many parallels between the Armenian people and the
Jewish people, both of whom have a large diaspora. The
Jewish people fully understand the suffering and the hurt
that the Armenian people have experienced. It should never
be forgotten that the ease by which the Armenian genocide
was perpetrated by the Ottoman Turkish government—and just
as easily forgotten by a complacent world that lacked moral
fortitude—only invited the Nazi German government to plan
the “final solution of the Jewish Question” just as the
Ottoman Turkish government planned the “final solution of
the Armenian Question.”
The sterling credibility of the ADL has been severely
tarnished. Double shame on their leadership for having
allowed that to happen. |